All businesses function on decision making during all projects and operations. Similarly, a functional government makes decisions in every department. The decisions may be made at a snail’s pace or be biased, but they are made. And, data is the basis of all decisions – in a government or in a business. A government bureaucrat can make decisions based on social data that he has. Alternatively, he can bias the decisions towards the pile of currency that presents itself on his table, which in this case is based on the
bribe. So, decisions are also based on the data – be it actual or
bribe.
The bribe-based decision-making model is a
norm in almost all government departments. Consequently, almost all electoral candidates have an incentive of easy money when they contest the elections. However, we the people, who are indirectly responsible for selecting almost every major government official, have no literal, visible, and guaranteed incentive presented to us – when we vote. In addition, majority of the society still bases its decisions on emotional incentives and not data. For example, a green grocer in any village will keep an apposite profit-loss account for all his transactions irrespective of his educational qualification. If you visit him and bargain hard for a grocery, be assured that he will not agree to a deal that compromises his profit margins. However, the same vendor, who is a shrewd business man, will make emotional decisions and vote for a representative belonging to his own:
- Religion,
- Caste, and
- Community
I have numbered the green grocers’ decision making criteria because he will filter the candidates – first for their religion, next for their caste, and finally for their community.
The grocer’s case applies to a major part of the population, even in the metro cities. Most people will make their personal business decisions shrewdly, but will make emotional decisions while voting. What such people need to realize is that the policies defined by the emotionally-selected candidates will directly impact our businesses, lives, and standard of society.
If a political candidate does not think beyond the welfare of one particular section, then that person is certainly unreliable and is least likely to fulfil his promises. Let’s assume that the candidate fulfils the pre-election promises for
your community. As a result, it will widen the gap between your community and other sections in the society. Consequently, it will lead to divisions in the society as a whole. So, why is the case that emotional decisions are not made by most in business, but are blindly adopted in democratic voting? In addition, why are shrewd decisions overlooked while voting when the electorate will directly impact your business?
Well, it is because being human is being emotional. And, society as a whole is more emotional than us as individuals. Politicos have realized this fact and are selling emotions, and the society is buying the emotions being sold. So, we the people are not making shrewd, business-like, decisions, but are making emotional decisions to select the people who govern our country. As a result, we need to overcome our underlying attachment to people from our community and select candidates based on their forte.
From where do I get the data?If you are wondering – from where do I get the data to make my decisions? I have two sources. First is the Internet and the next is the Media.
The InternetThe Internet has closed the information gap that existed in the past, when a lot of information was available to a select few. With the Internet, information asymmetry is rapidly beginning to disappear. Even in democracy, Internet is beginning to play its role. During every election, several sites post information about all candidates, which you can leverage and select the best candidate.
The MediaI can’t imagine
most farmers in remote villages browsing the Internet, at least not in the present age. However, I am sure that most farmers will have access to either T.V. or a news paper. Hence, in a country like India, where most of the population still resides in villages, media is more important than the Internet. Therefore, the role of media is most important in a democracy as it provides the major part of society with the all important – DATA to make decisions. Hence, it is important that the media is neutral and is free of bias. As a result, we don’t need channels that showcase mystical charms of some self-proclaimed saint or horror stories of never-seen ghosts during prime time.
We need a media that is responsible and showcases important issues that affect governance and democratic operations. However, due to commercial obligations, they need to present some marketable shows or articles, but we have the option to select the channel we see or the news paper we read. So, just like you prune your business projects, filter the source of information.
The Eternal Excuse – No Candidate is Good In most cases, you may not have any qualified candidate to select during elections. So, just don’t sit at home in regret. Register your protest by leveraging the rule 49-O, which allows you to declare that you did not find any candidate suitable for your vote. And again, don’t sit at home after registering your displeasure. Join some NGO and try to make a difference.
In addition, don’t just give charity. You cannot sign a check and think you have done something for the society. The cash drawn with the check may never reach its beneficiary. Spend some time in an orphanage, teach the under-privileged on your weekends, or just pay a visit to an old-age home. Your time and company will be more valuable than your checks. So, ACT MORE and SIGN LESS.
An Emotional IndependenceIndependence to me is beyond the
‘Happy Independence Day’ text messages and social networking updates. There is an emotional energy and motivation that guides me to improve, learn, teach, and be honest in an independent society. I am emotional for mine and nation’s independence, which was earned through sacrifices of selfless acts of heroism. All those who fought for the freedom were emotional for freedom, but were prudent, honest, and selfless to the core. Be emotional for them and those who are making the world a better place and avoid sentiments for those selling religion-caste-community-based emotions.
Be the business man of democracy who makes shrewd decisions to select candidates. Be a CEO who treats his vote as an investment on behalf of the society and not a charity.